Below is some general information on these rackets including their brand, model numbers, version, and colors.
|General info||Blade 100||Ezone 100|
Summary of Differences: The Blade 100 has a slightly lower strung weight (316g vs 318g), a higher swing weight (327 vs 317), and thicker beam width (22mm vs 23.5mm / 26mm / 22mm).
|Racket Specs:||Blade 100||Ezone 100||% Difference|
|Composition:||Braided Graphite||M40X/HM Graphite||–|
|Head Size (sq cm)||645||645||0%|
|Head Size (sq in)||100||100||0%|
|String Pattern||16 x 19||16 x 19||–|
|HL or HH1||HL||HL||–|
|Strung Balance (cm)||33||33||0%|
|Strung Balance (pts)||4||4||0%|
|Strung Weight (grams)||316||318||1%|
|Strung Weight (ounces)||11.15||11.22||1%|
|Unstrung balance (cm)||32||32||0%|
|Unstrung balance (pts)||7||7||0%|
|Unstrung Weight (grams)||300||300||0%|
|Unstrung Weight (ounces)||10.58||10.6||0%|
|Beam Width (mm)||22||23.5 / 26 / 22||0-18%|
1 Head Light or Head Heavy
Pros and Cons
Below are what I think are the main pros and cons of these two tennis rackets.
|Pros and Cons||Blade 100||Ezone 100|
|Pros||– Nice Design, Manageable Weight, Good Spin||– Manoeuvrable, Good Power|
|Cons||– Stiff Frame||– Stiff Frame|
Head to Head
Below are my recommendations in terms of which racket is better in terms of Power, Control, Spin, and Arm Friendliness.
NB: Both rackets have very similar specs, so they will be very little difference between them.
|H2H||Blade 100||Ezone 100|
Below are my recommendations for recreational players at the beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels.
|Player Level||Blade 100||Ezone 100|
Pro Player Endorsements
The Blade 100 is not currently endorsed by any pro tennis player.