Wilson Clash 100 vs Head Radical MP – Racket Specs Comparison
Main Differences: The Clash 100 has a lower strung weight (11.0oz vs 11.20oz), a slightly lower swing weight (313 vs 323), a more head light balance (7 pts HL vs 4 pts HL), a lower frame stiffness rating (57 vs 65), and a thicker beam width (24.5mm vs 20mm / 23mm / 21mm).
Similarities: Both rackets have a 100in head size, 27in racket length, and a 16 x 19 string pattern.
|Specs:||Clash 100||Radical MP|
|Strung Weight:||312g (11.00oz)||318g (11.20oz)|
|Balance:||7 pts HL||4 pts HL|
|TW Stiffness Rating:||57||65|
|Power:||Low to Medium||Low to Medium|
|Player Level:||Intermediate to Advanced||Intermediate to Advanced|
|Beam Width:||24.5mm / 24.5mm / 24.5mm||20mm / 23mm / 21mm|
|Colors:||Red Cherry||Orange and Black|
|String Pattern:||16 x 19||16 x 19|
|Grip Type:||Wilson Pro Performance||Head Hydrosorb Pro|
|Mains Skip:||7T,9T,7H,9H||8T, 8H|
Pros and Cons
|Pros:||Powerful frame, good arm comfort, and manageable weight.||Nice blend of power, spin, and control with a manageable weight|
|Cons:||Advanced players will find the racket does not have enough control.||More advanced players may feel it lacks control|
Head to Head
Below are my recommendations in terms of which racket is better in terms of Power, Control, Spin, and Arm Friendliness.
Below are our recommendations for recreational players at the beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels.
|Player Level||Clash 100||MP|
Pro Player Endorsements
The Radical MP is endorsed by Taylor Fritz and Diego Schwartzman, while the Clash 100 is not currently endorsed by any pro tennis players as the Clash racket range is aimed at recreational tennis player